How do I audit my vacation rental brand's AI search visibility?

Don't run '[my brand] reviews' — every operator gets cited 100% of the time on those prompts. Run destination-discovery prompts ('where should I book a cabin in the Smokies?', 'best beach houses for families in [destination]?'). If your brand isn't surfaced there, you're invisible to high-intent buyers who haven't named you yet.

Why should I test all four AI engines for vacation rental SEO?

Engine spread is significant. Across the 5 vacation rental brands tested, Claude cited at 55%, Perplexity 50%, ChatGPT 45%, and Gemini 32.5% — a 1.7× gap between Claude and Gemini. The user picking a vacation rental doesn't know which engine they're talking to.

How do I get LLMs to cite my vacation rental brand for destination queries?

Regional, destination-specific operators (Sand 'N Sea in Galveston, Telluride Lodging in Telluride) outperform national marketplaces in destination-discovery prompts. LLMs prefer to surface specific operators when the user names a destination. Lean into the destination in your brand and content if you can.

What is the discovery funnel cliff in AI search?

Branded queries (where the user names the brand) hit 97% citation rates across all engines. But trip-planning queries ('I'm planning a family trip to X — where should we stay?') hit only 10%. Listicle queries hit 15%. The strategic AEO/GEO work is up-funnel: earn the mention before the user types your name.

Who are the dominant brands LLMs cite in vacation rental discovery queries?

Airbnb and Vrbo dominate both the co-mention set (29 and 26 mentions across 5 studied operators) and the displacement set (61 and 56 mentions when the operator was absent). Vacasa, Marriott, and Booking.com round out the top tier.

Original research · May 2026 · 5 brands tested

How vacation rentals get found in 2026.

Q: Does schema markup affect AI search visibility for vacation rentals?

Yes. Schema markup is what AI engines parse first. Organization, Service, FAQPage, Quotation, and Article schemas on every commercial page is the table-stakes ask. Named entity + dated quotes + structured Q&A is the citation-friendly pattern Claude rewards most.

Original 2026 research on vacation rental SEO and AI search visibility. We tested 5 real vacation rental brands — Cabins For You, Sand ‘N Sea Properties, Telluride Lodging, RedAwning, and AvantStay — across 4 AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude) and 40 discovery prompts. 160 responses, what gets cited, who gets displaced. Regularly refreshed.

Read the findings See methodology

The funnel-stage cliff 5 brands tested What this means for operators

Last refresh: 2026-05-02 Coverage: United States

Vacation rental brands tested
(Cabins For You, Sand ‘N Sea, Telluride Lodging, RedAwning, AvantStay)

Discovery prompts
(8 per brand: brand, destination, listicle, trip-planning, direct-intent)

160

Responses analyzed
for citations, peer set, and displacement

AI engines tested
(ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude)

New: this research now has a companion how-to. Read the property manager's guide to AI search for vacation rentals, the playbook built on this data.

Finding 01 · AI search visibility

AI engines name vacation rental brands at very different rates.

We ran 40 discovery prompts (8 per brand × 5 brands) through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude — 160 responses in total. The industry-wide mention rate varies 1.7× across engines. Claude leads at 55%, Gemini lags at 32.5%. The AI search visibility takeaway: a brand can be highly visible on Claude and effectively absent on Gemini, and the user picking a vacation rental doesn’t know which engine they’re talking to.

Engine

Industry mention rate (5 brands × 40 prompts)

Rate

Mentioned

Claude

55.0%

22 / 40

Perplexity

50.0%

20 / 40

ChatGPT

45.0%

18 / 40

Gemini

32.5%

13 / 40

Claude is the most generous citation engine for named operator brands; Gemini consistently underweights them, likely a function of Google's preference for surfacing OTAs (Vrbo, Booking.com) where it has commercial relationships. The implication for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): a brand can be highly visible on Claude and effectively absent on Gemini. Optimizing for one engine is not the same as optimizing for all four — schema markup, FAQ structure, and citation-friendly headings need to ship on every commercial page.

Finding 02 · The discovery funnel cliff

Branded queries are solved. Top-of-funnel is wide open.

When a user types a brand by name, every operator we tested gets cited 97% of the time. But the moment the user describes intent without naming a brand — "where should we stay in the Smokies?", "top sites for cabins?" — citation rate collapses to 10–15%. LLMs default to Airbnb / Vrbo / Vacasa for trip planning unless something else is hard-baked in.

For any vacation rental operator, the strategic AEO/GEO work is up-funnel: earning the top-of-funnel mention before the user types your name. The bottom of the funnel takes care of itself; the top is where the marketing battle actually happens. See how 5 brands stack up →

Update · August 2026

Our new, much larger study (thousands of AI answers across 20 markets) adds the category view to this picture. At least one property manager is cited in 90% of the AI answers we tested, and operator-direct websites take 42% of all citations, more than the OTAs. The 10–15% figure above is the brand view: any single operator still appears in a small share of answers, because AI spreads those citations across what is typically 80 to 150 operators per market.

The category is winning. The question is whether AI picks you. Read the full findings: AI Search Isn't SEO →

Branded query"What is [brand]?" / "[brand] reviews"

97%cited

Direct-intent"Vacation rental sites where I can book directly, not through Airbnb"

40%cited

Destination-best"Where should I book a cabin / beach / ski rental in [destination]?"

38%cited

Listicle"Top vacation rental websites for [category] in 2026"

15%cited

Trip-planning"I'm planning a family trip to [destination] — where should we stay?"

10%cited

Finding 03 · Keyword strategy framework

Every vacation rental keyword sits in one of four quadrants.

Cross-tabulating Google rank with AI engine visibility gives every vacation rental keyword a coordinate. The four quadrants are not equal: they require different content investments, different schema patterns, and different success metrics. The framework below is how we sequence vacation rental SEO and AEO work in 2026 — for any operator, agency, or SaaS brand selling into the category.

Quadrant A · Defend

Google ranks. AI engines cite.

The brand's beachhead. The work here is defensive: keep the page fresh, keep the schema valid, monitor displacement. Don't break what's working. For destination-anchored operators (Sand 'N Sea, Telluride Lodging), this is where the brand-name + destination prompts live. See the SaaS comparison →

Quadrant B · Structure

Google ranks. AI engines miss.

A citation problem, not a content problem. The page exists, the rank exists, but LLMs don't lift the answer. Organization, Service, FAQPage, and Article schemas, FAQ structure, and concise definitional copy unlock these. Small AEO wins, fast turnaround.

Quadrant C · Invest

Google misses. AI engines miss.

Where the real vacation rental SEO work lives. High-volume, high-intent terms with no presence on either surface. For operators: trip-planning queries, listicles, and destination-discovery prompts where citation rate is 10–15%. For SaaS brands: "vacation rental website builder," PMS-alternatives clusters. New pillar pages, original research, named case studies.

Quadrant D · Protect

Google misses. AI engines cite.

Brand-led territory. Branded queries ("What is [brand]?", "[brand] reviews") where Google volume is low but every operator we tested gets cited 100% of the time. The biggest moat is when the brand contains the destination — Sand 'N Sea owns Galveston, Telluride Lodging owns Telluride. No other named competitor surfaces.

Finding 03b · The 5 brands tested

Regional operators outperform national marketplaces.

Five real vacation rental brands, eight discovery prompts each, four AI engines. Mention rate ranges from 28% to 62%. The pattern: regional, destination-specific operators (Sand ‘N Sea, Telluride Lodging) win the “where to book in [city]” prompts. National marketplaces (RedAwning) underperform. LLMs prefer to surface specific operators over aggregators, even when the user hasn’t asked for a specific destination.

Sand 'N Sea Properties

Galveston regional operator · sandnsea.com

62.5%

20 / 32 prompts

Best: Claude 75%
Worst: Gemini 50%

Co-mentioned withVrbo, Airbnb, Vacasa, Booking.com

Displaced bySame OTAs — no other Galveston brand surfaces

Sand 'N Sea owns Galveston in AI engines. No other Galveston-named operator appears in the displacement set. Strong destination moat — the brand is the destination.

AvantStay

Tech-forward luxury STR · avantstay.com

53.1%

17 / 32 prompts

Best: Claude 75%
Worst: Gemini 37.5%

Co-mentioned withMarriott, Airbnb, Vrbo, Vacasa, Hilton, Sonder, Casago, Wander

Displaced byAirbnb, Wander, Marriott, Vrbo

AvantStay is positioned as a hospitality alternative to hotels — Marriott and Hilton appear in the comp set, alongside Sonder, Casago, and Wander. None of which appear for the other 4 studied brands.

Telluride Lodging Co

Colorado ski operator · telluridelodgingco.com

46.9%

15 / 32 prompts

Best: Claude / ChatGPT 62.5%
Worst: Gemini 12.5%

Co-mentioned withAirbnb, Vrbo, Vacasa, Telluride Resort Lodging

Displaced byVrbo, Airbnb, Vacasa

Owns Telluride in 3 of 4 engines. The 5× Claude-vs-Gemini gap is the widest spread in the study — whatever Telluride Lodging is doing, Claude rewards it and Gemini barely registers. A Gemini-specific gap to investigate.

Cabins For You

Smoky Mountains cabin operator · cabinsforyou.com

37.5%

12 / 32 prompts

All 4 engines tied at 37.5%
(unusually flat)

Co-mentioned withAirbnb, Vrbo, Cabins of the Smoky Mountains, Elk Springs Resort

Displaced byAirbnb, Vrbo, Elk Springs Resort, Cabins of the Smoky Mountains, Bear Cove Cabins

Being beaten on its home turf. The flat 37.5% across all 4 engines is unusual — most brands have 2–3× spreads. Engines all agree CFY is "fine" in the Smokies but never the top suggestion. Stable but unenthusiastic.

RedAwning

National vacation rental marketplace · redawning.com

28.1%

9 / 32 prompts

Best: Perplexity 37.5%
Worst: 3-way tie 25%

Co-mentioned withAirbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com, Expedia, Track, Streamline

Displaced byVrbo, Airbnb, Booking.com, Vacasa, Marriott, Expedia, Whimstay

National marketplaces fight an uphill battle against entrenched OTA recall. RedAwning gets named alongside the OTAs but loses to them when displaced. Aggregator brands underperform destination-specific operators in AI-driven discovery.

From the field

The marketing battle is one stage up the funnel.

Branded queries are solved — every operator we tested gets cited 97% of the time when the user names them. The marketing battle is one stage up: who gets named in "where should I book a cabin in the Smokies?" That's where vacation rental discovery actually happens in 2026, and it's wildly under-optimized industry-wide.

Gil Chan
Co-founder, CraftedStays May 2026 · CraftedStays original research

Finding 04 · SEO + AEO implications

What this means if you run a vacation rental brand.

Six concrete vacation rental SEO and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) moves, ranked by leverage. Implementation order matters: structure first, content second, distribution third. Every one of these maps to at least one finding above, and every one is something Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) practitioners are now testing.

Audit beyond branded.

Don't run "[my brand] reviews" — every operator gets cited 100% of the time on those. Run "where should I book a cabin in the Smokies?" or "best beach houses for families in [destination]." If your brand isn't there, you're invisible to the highest-intent buyers in the category.

Test all four engines.

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude. Don't optimize for the one your team uses. Engine spread is the finding: across the 5 brands tested, Claude cited at 55% and Gemini at 32.5% — a 1.7× gap. The user picking a rental doesn't know which engine they're talking to.

Own your destination.

The strongest signal in the data: regional operators (Sand 'N Sea in Galveston, Telluride Lodging in Telluride) outperform national marketplaces because LLMs prefer to surface specific operators when the user names a destination. If your brand contains the destination, lean into it — that's a moat.

Add structured data.

Schema markup is what AI engines parse first. Organization, Service, FAQPage, Quotation, and Article schemas on every commercial page is the table-stakes ask. Named entity + dated quotes + structured Q&A is the citation-friendly pattern Claude rewards most.

Watch your peer set.

When the LLM doesn't name you, who does it name instead? Cabins For You is being beaten by Elk Springs Resort and Cabins of the Smoky Mountains on its own home turf. RedAwning loses to Vrbo, Airbnb, and Booking.com. That displacement list is your real competitive frame.

Optimize for top-of-funnel.

Branded query citations are 97% — solved. Trip-planning citations are 10%. The strategic AEO/GEO work is one stage up the funnel: build the destination guides, the listicles, and the named comparison pages that earn the mention before the user types your name.

Finding 05 · Competitive landscape

Who LLMs name when they don't name you.

Aggregated across the 5 vacation rental brands tested. The left column is who LLMs co-mention alongside the operator when the operator is named. The right column is who replaces the operator when they’re absent. The headline read: Airbnb and Vrbo dominate both columns — they are the default citation slot for any unnamed vacation rental query, and any operator brand is fighting for share against entrenched OTA recall.

Co-mentioned with the operator

Aggregate across all 5 studied brands — total times each brand appeared alongside an operator in responses where the operator was named.

Airbnb29
Vrbo26
Marriott11
Vacasa8
Booking.com6
Expedia5
Sonder2
Casago2
Wander2
Hilton2

Named when the operator is absent

Aggregate across all 5 studied brands — brands the engines hand the answer slot to when the studied operator is missing. The growth gap.

Airbnb61
Vrbo56
Vacasa15
Marriott15
Booking.com13
Elk Springs Resort10
Expedia8
Wander8
Cabins of the Smoky Mountains7
Whimstay5

Methodology

How we ran this study.

Reproducible. Same brands, same prompts, same engines. Source data, scripts, and prompts available on request.

Engines tested

ChatGPT (gpt-5), Perplexity (sonar-pro), Gemini (gemini-2.5-pro), Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6). All queries run via a programmatic LLM API with web search enabled, so each engine reads the live web on every prompt.

Brands tested

5 real vacation rental operators selected for category and destination diversity: Cabins For You (Smoky Mountains cabin operator), Sand ‘N Sea Properties (Galveston regional), Telluride Lodging (Colorado ski), RedAwning (national marketplace), and AvantStay (tech-forward luxury STR).

Prompt design

40 prompts (8 per brand) spanning 5 funnel stages: brand-name awareness, destination-best, destination-direct, trip-planning, listicle, and direct-intent. Each prompt is run once per engine; mention rate is computed across the full 8-prompt set per brand.

What we measure

(1) Mention rate by engine. (2) Mention rate by funnel stage (branded → trip-planning). (3) Co-mention peer set when the operator is named. (4) Displacement set when the operator is absent. (5) Per-brand mention rate to compare regional, marketplace, and luxury operators side-by-side.

Refresh cadence

Regularly refreshed against new data. Same brands, same prompts, same engines so diffs are clean across runs. Subscribe to be notified when the next refresh ships.

Reproducibility

Scripts, prompt set, and raw responses are available on request to credentialed researchers and partners. We hold the same brands, same prompts, and same engines steady across runs so the diffs are clean.

Want this analysis for your brand.

If you run a short-term rental SaaS, a multi-property portfolio, or an agency selling into the category, we’ll run the same study against your domain. One flat fee, results in two weeks.

Get the study for your brand →

The platform behind high-performing direct booking websites for short-term rental operators.

Address

1559 Sloat Blvd
Ste B #166
San Francisco, CA 94132
USA

Contact Us

Email: hello@craftedstays.co
Tel: (415) 908-1411